A Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row

a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row
a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row

A Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row A schematic diagram showing r0 (5 cm row spacing), r1 (15 cm row spacing), r2 (25 cm row spacing) and r3 (35 cm row spacing) planting patterns at a density of 3,600,000 plants ha 1 over two years. Note: r 0, r 1, r 2 and r 3 refer to 5 cm row spacing, 15 cm row spacing, 25 cm row spacing and 35 cm row spacing, respectively. the data represent the mean ± se (n = 3). a d values followed by different letters within columns for the same cultivar are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.

a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row
a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row

A Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row A schematic diagram showing r0 (5 cm row spacing), r1 (15 cm row spacing), r2 (25 cm row spacing) and r3 (35 cm row spacing) planting patterns at a density of 3,600,000 plants ha 1 over two years. The highest yields were achieved at a density of 45 × 104 plants ha−1 (d45) in combination with 15 cm row spacing (r15) because mortality associated with competition increased as both the plant. R0, r1, r2 and r3 refer to 5 cm row spacing, 15 cm row spacing, 25 cm row spacing and 35 cm row spacing, respectively. plants with a uniform spatial distribution show better tolerance to high. At the same time, a longer duration of cap and green leaf area was maintained in r1 during grain filling. compared with conventional row spacing, wennong6 in r1 treatment obtained 21.0% and 19.1% higher grain yield in 2011 and 2012, respectively, while for jimai22 it increased by 11.3% and 11.4%, respectively.

a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row
a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row

A Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row R0, r1, r2 and r3 refer to 5 cm row spacing, 15 cm row spacing, 25 cm row spacing and 35 cm row spacing, respectively. plants with a uniform spatial distribution show better tolerance to high. At the same time, a longer duration of cap and green leaf area was maintained in r1 during grain filling. compared with conventional row spacing, wennong6 in r1 treatment obtained 21.0% and 19.1% higher grain yield in 2011 and 2012, respectively, while for jimai22 it increased by 11.3% and 11.4%, respectively. Two planting patterns were implemented in the trial: the first pattern (m1) involved a single film covering three rows with a 76 cm inter row spacing and a 7 cm intra row plant spacing; the second pattern (m2) featured a single film over six rows with an alternating row pattern, consisting of 66 cm wide and 10 cm narrow rows, while maintaining. A split plot experimental design was employed with two row spacing patterns (r 1, wide narrow row spacing configuration, 66 10 cm; r 2, uniform row spacing configuration, 76 cm) in the main plots and six planting densities (d 1–6, 4.5, 9.0, 13.5, 18.0, 22.5, and 27.0 plants m −2) in the subplots. the split plot arrangement with three.

a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row
a Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row

A Schematic Diagram Showing R0 5 Cm Row Spacing R1 15 Cm Row Two planting patterns were implemented in the trial: the first pattern (m1) involved a single film covering three rows with a 76 cm inter row spacing and a 7 cm intra row plant spacing; the second pattern (m2) featured a single film over six rows with an alternating row pattern, consisting of 66 cm wide and 10 cm narrow rows, while maintaining. A split plot experimental design was employed with two row spacing patterns (r 1, wide narrow row spacing configuration, 66 10 cm; r 2, uniform row spacing configuration, 76 cm) in the main plots and six planting densities (d 1–6, 4.5, 9.0, 13.5, 18.0, 22.5, and 27.0 plants m −2) in the subplots. the split plot arrangement with three.

A Equivalent Circuit Model Of r0 And r1 Units Top And Ground Layer
A Equivalent Circuit Model Of r0 And r1 Units Top And Ground Layer

A Equivalent Circuit Model Of R0 And R1 Units Top And Ground Layer

Comments are closed.