Bernier V Boston Edison Co Case Brief Case Name B Bernier and kasputys later added boston edison company as a defendant in separate actions, alleging negligence in the pole’s design. the cases were consolidated for trial, and the jury found ramsdell and edison liable. edison appealed the decision, leading to the current case before the supreme judicial court of massachusetts. Citationbernier v. boston edison co., 380 mass. 372 (mass. apr. 11, 1980) brief fact summary. this is an appeal of a united states district court (massachusetts) judgment in favor of bernier (plaintiff) in consolidated actions for injuries suffered when an automobile knocked over an electric pole and struck teenagers as they walked down a sidewalk.
How To Write A Case Brief A Guide With Format And Examples Facts on may 24, 1972, arthur bernier, jr., and patricia j. kasputys, then eighteen and fifteen years old, were walking. Bernier v. boston edison co. case brief summary: victims from a severe car accident launched separate lawsuits against drivers involved and boston edison for their role in having an improperly designed and maintained electric pole that fell and worsened their injuries. Get more case briefs explained with quimbee. quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks quimbee case briefs. Get bernier v. boston edison co., 403 n.e.2d 391 (1980), massachusetts supreme judicial court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. written and curated by real attorneys at quimbee.
First Baptist Church Of Moultrie V Barber Contracting Co Case Brief Get more case briefs explained with quimbee. quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks quimbee case briefs. Get bernier v. boston edison co., 403 n.e.2d 391 (1980), massachusetts supreme judicial court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. written and curated by real attorneys at quimbee. *377 but first, was edison responsible for the design and use of the pole? a prerequisite to being held liable for acting unreasonably in these respects. see smith v. ariens co., 375 mass. 620, 621 623 (1978); tritsch v. boston edison co., supra at 181. Bernier v. boston edison co. 380 mass. 372, 403 n.e.2d 391 (1980) bernier and kasputys were walking down the street where (after a complicated series of events), a car driven by ramsdell jumped a curb and knocked down a light pole, which fell and injured the two. bernier sued the light pole owner, boston edison, for negligence.
Legal Case Brief Summary Outline Template For Law Students Etsy *377 but first, was edison responsible for the design and use of the pole? a prerequisite to being held liable for acting unreasonably in these respects. see smith v. ariens co., 375 mass. 620, 621 623 (1978); tritsch v. boston edison co., supra at 181. Bernier v. boston edison co. 380 mass. 372, 403 n.e.2d 391 (1980) bernier and kasputys were walking down the street where (after a complicated series of events), a car driven by ramsdell jumped a curb and knocked down a light pole, which fell and injured the two. bernier sued the light pole owner, boston edison, for negligence.
Assignment 4 Bernier V Boston Edison Co Docx Ce 583 Read And
Comments are closed.