Court Traffic Stop Ok Despite Mistake Of Law The supreme court agreed, finding that the fourth amendment requires police to act reasonably, but not perfectly. roberts said that just as a police officer’s mistake of fact can justify a traffic stop, a reasonable misunderstanding about the law can also satisfy the constitution. December 15, 2014 10:40 am. by sam hananel. associated press. washington — the supreme court ruled monday that police can use evidence seized during a traffic stop even if it turns out the officers were mistaken in thinking the driver had broken the law when they pulled the vehicle over. the 8 1 decision written by chief justice john roberts.
Court Traffic Stop Ok Despite Mistake Of Law Washington (ap) – police can use evidence seized during a traffic stop even if it turns out the officers initially pulled a car over based on a misunderstanding of the law, the supreme court. Washington — police can use evidence seized during a traffic stop even if it turns out the officers initially pulled a car over based on a misunderstanding of the law, the supreme court ruled. Supreme court: traffic stop, search ok despite misunderstanding of law by fox news published december 16, 2014 12:00am est | updated december 20, 2015 7:16pm est. Istockphoto. the u.s. supreme court on monday ruled that police officers don't necessarily violate a person's constitutional rights when they stop a car based on a mistaken understanding of the.
Supreme юааcourtюаб Police Can Make ташreasonableтащ Mistakes юааof Lawюаб In Supreme court: traffic stop, search ok despite misunderstanding of law by fox news published december 16, 2014 12:00am est | updated december 20, 2015 7:16pm est. Istockphoto. the u.s. supreme court on monday ruled that police officers don't necessarily violate a person's constitutional rights when they stop a car based on a mistaken understanding of the. Police can use evidence seized during a traffic stop even if it turns out the officers initially pulled a car over based on a misunderstanding of the law, the supreme court ruled monday. Police officers may stop a vehicle based on a misunderstanding of traffic laws without violating the civil rights, the supreme court has ruled. in its 8 1 ruling on monday, the high court found that even though a north carolina police officer misunderstood a state traffic law regarding brake lights, the mistake was reasonable, and thus the search that followed was not illegal. the driver.
Extended Traffic Stop Conviction Tossed By Court Youtube Police can use evidence seized during a traffic stop even if it turns out the officers initially pulled a car over based on a misunderstanding of the law, the supreme court ruled monday. Police officers may stop a vehicle based on a misunderstanding of traffic laws without violating the civil rights, the supreme court has ruled. in its 8 1 ruling on monday, the high court found that even though a north carolina police officer misunderstood a state traffic law regarding brake lights, the mistake was reasonable, and thus the search that followed was not illegal. the driver.
Comments are closed.